|
Tentative Conference Agenda
Days 1-3
8:00-16:45
Conference Registration
9:00-10:25 Concurrent Session #1-3
10:25-10:40
Coffee Break
10:45-12:10 Concurrent Session #4-6
12:15-13:40 Lunch, Table Leaders, Welcome
13:45-15:10 Concurrent Session #7-9
15:10-15:25
Coffee Break
15:30-16:55
Concurrent Session #10-12
Proposal Types:
There are two types of proposals – research papers and colloquium.
Research papers
will be presented in a 25 minute time slot during the meeting. The total
time for the presentation should be about 15 minutes with ten minutes for
question and answer. Each person who has an accepted proposal will need to
serve as a chair (simply introducing the presenter and keeping time) for one
session, typically in the same room and 90 minute time block where the
person gives her own presentation.
Colloquia
are typically comprised of 3-5 individuals who will each present on a
similar topic. This could be five papers on the same general topic, or an
‘experts panel’ where everyone discusses the same issue.
Scheduling.
In order to insure that there are very few ‘no-shows’ we require that all
presenters pre-register for the conference. This must be done before their
session is scheduled in the program grid. A list of accepted proposals will
be posted to the website, however the preliminary program with the scheduled
times of the registered participants will only be available about a month
before the conference. Registrations are accepted up until two weeks before
the conference. We take scheduling
requests due to religious observation, unusual family responsibilities, and
unusual work responsibilities.
Table Discussions:
The concept is to have some of the tables in the lunch banquet set
aside for theme-oriented discussions during the lunch.
For example, a person might want to meet with presenters who are from
the same discipline (e.g. Sociology, Economics). Other themes could be by
the subject of the research/interest (e.g. Homelessness, Public Opinion). It
could also be oriented around methods (e.g. experimental, archival) or
geography (attendees from Europe). The proposed discussion topics are
reviewed by the conference committee before they are approved. The person
who proposes the theme is the table leader and should insure introductions
are made and should facilitate the conversation, remembering that the theme
oriented discussion may only take a short portion of the time for lunch. In
addition, if people want to extend the discussion, this might be a good time
to make dinner plans with folks with a similar background/interest.
Participation Limits.
Due to space limits and to insure that everyone has a chance to participate,
only two proposals may be submitted per person.
Virtual presentations.
This is an option that has been requested by scholars who are traveling from
other continents. A virtual presentation and virtual conference registration
will allow you to record your presentation for on-line distribution via
YouTube. We encourage all
presenters to create a video version of their presentation that can be
linked to the program. This can be done either by 1) recording a video of
your presentation before or after the conference (or ask a colleague to
record your presentation at the conference) or 2) create a PowerPoint
presentation with voice over before or after the conference.
Publication.
All papers will be published in an on-line proceedings. This would not
preclude the author(s) from having the article published in a peer-reviewed
journal.
PodCasting. The Chair of each session is responsible for introducing the speaker and facilitating the Q&A after the presentation. Speaker should introduce themselves before they ask their questions. The Chair is also responsible for turning on the podcasting equipment prior to the session. Not all sessions will be podcast.
Garden District |
New Orleans - Riverboat |
Comments from Previous Attendees: "I particularly enjoyed the interdisciplinary nature of the meeting, and that it draws so many international scholars - it provides a wonderful perspective." "The quality of the food was the best that I have experienced at a professional meeting." "I appreciated the many opportunities to network with other researchers - at meals, during receptions and during sessions." "The conference ran very smoothly." "The meeting was professionally helpful, but it was also a lot of fun. Make sure you send me information about the next meeting." |